EXPLORE:
About Us
Reporting from the frontiers of health and medicine

Corrections Policy

How GenoMethods reviews reported errors and handles corrections, clarifications, updates and requests that do not require a change.

Updated

How to Report a Problem

A useful correction request should identify the exact part of the article being challenged and explain why the published information may be inaccurate, incomplete, unclear or no longer current.

  • Article URL
  • Specific statement, number, date, quotation or technical detail
  • Why you believe it is wrong or materially misleading
  • Reliable supporting source or document where available
  • Contact details if follow-up may be necessary

How We Review a Request

  1. The relevant published material is identified.
  2. The disputed statement is compared with the underlying sources used for the article.
  3. Additional primary or authoritative records may be checked where they can clarify the issue.
  4. The editor determines whether the issue is factual, interpretive, contextual or simply a disagreement with the article.
  5. An editorial decision is made based on the available evidence and the material significance of the issue.

A request from a company, advertiser, executive, source or subject of coverage does not automatically require a change. The same factual standard applies regardless of who requests the correction.

Accurate reporting is not removed solely because it is unfavorable, commercially inconvenient or inconsistent with how a subject would prefer the story to be framed.

Possible Outcomes

CorrectionA published statement was factually wrong and the error should be fixed.
ClarificationThe original wording was technically accurate but could reasonably be misunderstood or lacked context needed for accurate interpretation.
UpdateMaterial new information became available after publication and changes the current understanding of the subject.
No changeThe published material remains supported by the evidence, or the request reflects disagreement rather than a factual or material contextual problem.

What Normally Does Not Receive a Correction Note

Minor changes that do not alter substantive meaning may be made without a separate correction notice. These edits improve readability or technical presentation without changing the facts or conclusions of the article.

  • spelling;
  • grammar;
  • formatting;
  • style consistency;
  • broken links;
  • minor typographical issues.

Material Corrections

If an error materially changes a reader's understanding of an article, GenoMethods may correct the article and provide an appropriate correction or update note. Materiality depends on whether the error affects an important fact, conclusion, scientific interpretation, clinical context, transaction detail or other central element of the published work.

The wording and placement depend on the nature and significance of the error.

Rankings, Reviews and Comparisons

If a factual error affects a ranking, review or comparison, GenoMethods may correct the underlying information and reconsider the resulting assessment or ordering. Correcting the source data may therefore change an editorial result when that result depended on the inaccurate information.

A request for a higher ranking position by itself is not a basis for a change.

Editorial Independence

Advertising, partnership or commercial relationships do not determine whether an accurate article is corrected, removed or rewritten. Correction decisions are based on the published facts, supporting evidence and whether a meaningful error or clarification need exists.

Related Pages

GenoMethods
1 Broadway
Cambridge, MA 02142
United States