Reporting from the frontiers of health and medicine

Colossal Biosciences delays woolly mammoth comeback to 2030s

Colossal Biosciences delays woolly mammoth comeback to 2030s GenoMethods.org © genomethods.org
Colossal Biosciences delays woolly mammoth comeback to 2030s © genomethods.org
Colossal Biosciences has pushed its woolly mammoth de-extinction goal into the early 2030s after running into tougher genetic problems than expected.

Colossal Biosciences has run into a wall. The company now admits its 2028 target for bringing back the woolly mammoth was never realistic. Their Dallas team, once sure of their gene-editing plan, faces deeper scientific problems than they first thought.

The reason? At first, Colossal’s scientists thought they could recreate mammoth traits by editing about 60 genes in an elephant’s nucleus. That number has shot up. Now, they say it takes more than 150 genes. Each gene adds new complications. The scale of the work forced Colossal to drop any fixed date. CEO Ben Lamm now points only to the early 2030s as a possible window. In a recent interview, he said there is "no hard date" and it is "not 2036, but not 2030 either," according to the New York Post.

Colossal’s public timeline had previously pointed to 2028 for woolly mammoth calves, but this benchmark has now been officially delayed.

New York Post

The company’s approach starts with DNA from a mammoth found in Siberia in 2018. Using CRISPR and AI, Colossal mapped the genetic code differences between elephants and mammoths. They even found genes for traits like ear size. This isn’t just theory. Colossal has bred 38 “woolly mice” that carry mammoth hair genes. It’s a real test of their editing skills.

But moving from mice to mammoths is a much bigger leap. It’s proving harder than Colossal’s earlier work on the dire wolf, which they say they de-extincted in 2025. The mammoth project is bigger and more tangled. The company has had to reset its own expectations. So have people waiting to see Ice Age giants walk again.

Colossal isn’t stopping with mammoths. The company is also working on the dodo bird, Tasmanian tiger, and moa. They use the same AI and CRISPR tools. Each animal brings its own technical and ethical problems. These range from biodiversity risks to questions about synthetic biology’s place in conservation.

Colossal was founded in 2021 by entrepreneur Ben Lamm and geneticist George Church, and the mammoth remains the company’s flagship de-extinction project alongside work on the dodo, Tasmanian tiger, and moa.

Offit Kurman

Even with the delay, Colossal keeps pushing the limits of genome editing and synthetic biology. The company’s choice to publicly revise its timeline is rare in a field often full of hype. The early 2030s are now the new target for the mammoth’s return. But the real story is the stubborn complexity of rewriting nature’s code. One thing is clear. In de-extinction, ambition never outruns science.

Adrian Cole Founder, bioengineering editor and methods specialist GenoMethods.org
Biotechnology Newsroom

Adrian Cole

Adrian Cole is the Founder and Editor-in-Chief of GenoMethods, where he writes about bioengineering, genome and cell engineering, synthetic biology, computational biology and emerging research methods. His editorial approach focuses on how technologies actually work, how they are validated and where the evidence stops supporting the claim.